Intelligize Report: Virtual Annual Shareholder Meetings Are the New Reality

The coronavirus has forced many public companies to go virtual. And, no, we aren’t talking about the switch to remote work. We’re talking about the transition to virtual annual shareholder meetings, which, while prompted by the pandemic, could stay in effect even after the virus is gone.

The global health crisis has forced an unprecedented number of public companies to adopt a virtual format for their annual shareholder meetings in 2020, according to a new report released today by Intelligize. The report, Proof of concept: an Intelligize report on virtual annual shareholder meetings, suggests that this year’s trend could pave the way for a permanent switch.

The arguments for and against virtual meetings are well known. Advocates tout cost savings, reduced environmental impact, shareholder convenience, broader attendance, and greater shareholder participation in the voting process. (And they had some limited success.) Meanwhile, opponents lament that virtual meetings rob investors of the opportunity to confront management face-to-face, and fear that companies will cherry-pick questions in the Q&A. With virtual meetings, activists also lose out on a high-profile setting to criticize corporate behavior.

Then the pandemic came, tossed the familiar arguments out the window, and forced companies to change. Our report addresses three major questions about annual shareholder meeting format choices in 2020 and beyond:

  • How did COVID-19 change the meeting format choice for S&P 500 companies?
  • How did state laws and locations of headquarters impact annual meetings in the 2020 proxy season?
  • Is your industry ready for virtual annual meetings?

On the first, our report indicates that as of May 1, 2020, 65% of S&P 500 companies had either held or announced plans to hold virtual annual shareholder meetings this year. That may remove the biggest obstacle of all to virtual meetings—the fear of the unknown. Now that many companies have been forced to hold virtual meetings, they may never fear that choice in the same way again. Also, they now have the data—on shareholder attendance, cost savings, and more—that can be used in responding to future criticisms.

On the second question, our report offers a state-by-state breakdown on the number and percentage of firms that chose a virtual meeting format (by state of incorporation as well as by headquarters location).

On the third, we reviewed the top ten industries represented in the S&P 500 (using standard industrial classification code) and tallied up the number and percent of companies in each industry that adopted virtual meetings this year. The results were surprising for which industries climbed to the top—including, for instance, commercial banking.

The shift to virtual meetings may have been a leap of faith for issuers in 2020, but it wasn’t a blind one. And as our report suggests, by the time 2021 comes around, it may not feel like much of a leap at all.

Latest Articles

Easy Prediction for 2026: Insider Trading Concerns

Will Anthropic go public by December 31, 2026? Most people on Polymarket think so (it costs one dollar to win 71 cents as of this writing). But we wouldn’t advise betting on it, es...

Read More

Look, No Hands: The 2026 Proxy Season After the SEC’s No-Action Pullback

When the 2026 proxy season opened, corporate secretaries braced for the usual scramble over which shareholder proposals had to appear on the ballot and which could be left off. Wha...

Read More

Five Takeaways from the SEC’s (Newly Annual) Regulatory Agenda, and What it Says About the Commission’s Priorities

For decades, federal agencies have, with few exceptions, published the Unified Agenda twice each year: a list of every rule they plan to propose or finalize in the months ahead. It...

Read More