SEC Comment Letter Gets Serious on Non-GAAP Reporting to Colgate-Palmolive

In a 2016 SEC comment letter that only recently came to light, the SEC urged Colgate-Palmolive to clean up its act on its use of non-GAAP reporting. It’s the latest evidence that the securities watchdog is serious about cracking down on the reporting of such “adjusted” earnings, which has risen dramatically in the last decade.

In its letter, the SEC called out Colgate for citing accounting metrics that don’t adhere to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) on 10 different occasions in its earnings reports for 2015 and the first quarter of 2016. The household products giant isn’t the only corporation making aggressive use of non-GAAP data. As MarketWatch has noted:

A full 90% of S&P 500 companies reported non-GAAP numbers in 2015, up from about 70% in 2009,   and the spread between the two has widened significantly in the past few years. Non-GAAP earnings per share were higher than GAAP EPS by an average of 25% in 2015, compared with a variance of just 6% in 2013, according to William Blair.

Against that background, last May the SEC initiated a campaign to minimize the use of non-GAAP data. It released a set of guidelines aimed at making earnings reports less confusing and easier for investors to understand. While companies are not prohibited from including non-GAAP numbers in their reports, the guidelines note that the SEC may deem a company’s reporting to be misleading if, for instance, non-GAAP metrics are not presented consistently from quarter to quarter. When companies do complement their reporting with non-GAAP numbers, they must present the relevant GAAP-compliant number first, give both numbers equal attention, and explain how the two can be reconciled.

In the SEC’s comment letter to Colgate, they asked it to “explain why each of these [non-GAAP] measures is critical to an investor’s understanding of your results.” And as the SEC sees it, many others have explaining to do as well. Given the prevalent use of non-GAAP data, the SEC’s tough stance has put it at odds with several the markets’ biggest players. General Electric, General Motors, Coca-Cola, Hertz, Medtronic, Whirlpool, and Tesla have all received similar comment letters.

With such big names involved, this has become a high-profile issue. The SEC’s comment letter to Colgate, meanwhile, is just the latest indication that it is resolved to police it closely. That should have issuers of all sizes thinking carefully about how they are using non-GAAP reporting in their public disclosures.

Latest Articles

Potential Cybersecurity Strategies Taking Shape, Including Disclosure Rules

Last month, we detailed the emerging threats posed by cyberattacks to companies and the public at large. We also discussed the absence of obvious solu...

Comments Reveal Concerns with ESG Reporting

Commissioner Hester Peirce has developed a reputation for marching to the beat of her own drum since former President Trump appointed her to the Secur...

Crypto Confusion Wears on U.S. Authorities

It’s the middle of the day and you have a big project due tomorrow. You know you should be working on it, but first you need a snack. And you’ve b...